Migden Succeeds Despite Evidence of Sound Science

Earlier this week, the California Senate Health Committee heard testimony for SB 1712, a bill sponsored by State Senator Carole Migden that would essentially ban lipsticks from being sold in California. The Council opposed the bill explaining that lead is a naturally occurring element in these and many consumer products, and that lead is not intentionally added to these products by manufacturers.  Several activists testified in support of the ban on lipsticks claiming neurological and reproductive harm for those women who use lipstick containing even trace amounts of lead.  Interestingly, the hearing began with Senator Aanestad's impassioned reprimand of groups who neglect to present information based on sound science.  There is not a shred of scientific evidence that trace amounts of lead pose neurological or reproductive danger, he explained.  Fear mongering, he insisted, does not serve anyone.  We could not agree more.

Although the bill lacks scientific accurracy, it did pass the committee, but has a long way to go.  The bill also contradicts the independent opinion of the California Attorney General who concluded that the levels of lead in lipstick identified by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics do not raise a reasonable claim of a Prop 65 violation.

For more information on ingredient safety, and to get an inside look at the cosmetic industry, visit www.cosmeticsinfo.org.