Blog Post from American Trucking Associations
Banning Owner-Operators is Wrong, Says Daily Breeze Newspaper
December 16, 2009
Written by: Brad Stotler
State and local politicians shouldn't try to do the job of Teamsters organizers, the Daily Breeze wrote in their Dec. 12 article Focus on pollution, not labor.
"There's nothing wrong with the Teamsters wanting to organize truck drivers. But there is something wrong with local politicians trying to do their job for them, especially when it puts local economies at risk," said the Daily Breeze.
The article countered a previous Op-Ed written by Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Geraldine Knatz. In the Op-Ed, Knatz said the concession requirements that were initially put into the Port of LA Clean Truck Program were "worth fighting for." The Daily Breeze described in a different way those concession requirements that would make it easier to unionize port truck drivers.
"It seems the port doesn't just want to clean up dirty diesels, but to do a big favor for the Teamsters union. Los Angeles tried to ban independent truck owner-operators in favor of big trucking companies whose drivers are employees, which would make it much easier for the Teamsters to sign up new members," said the Daily Breeze.
"Unions can't organize independent contractors, but they can organize companies with employee drivers. As the Journal of Commerce put it, the Los Angeles Port's plan is 'a thinly veiled attempt to foster unionization of drivers'," said the Daily Breeze.
The Port of Long Beach never included these requirements in their clean trucks program. "Everybody was welcome, as long as they drove clean diesels. ... And the Clean Truck Program has worked just as well there; 80 percent of the diesel pollution caused by trucks has been removed," said the Daily Breeze.
"There's nothing wrong with the Teamsters wanting to organize truck drivers. But there is something wrong with local politicians trying to do their job for them, especially when it puts local economies at risk," said the Daily Breeze.
The article countered a previous Op-Ed written by Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Geraldine Knatz. In the Op-Ed, Knatz said the concession requirements that were initially put into the Port of LA Clean Truck Program were "worth fighting for." The Daily Breeze described in a different way those concession requirements that would make it easier to unionize port truck drivers.
"It seems the port doesn't just want to clean up dirty diesels, but to do a big favor for the Teamsters union. Los Angeles tried to ban independent truck owner-operators in favor of big trucking companies whose drivers are employees, which would make it much easier for the Teamsters to sign up new members," said the Daily Breeze.
"Unions can't organize independent contractors, but they can organize companies with employee drivers. As the Journal of Commerce put it, the Los Angeles Port's plan is 'a thinly veiled attempt to foster unionization of drivers'," said the Daily Breeze.
The Port of Long Beach never included these requirements in their clean trucks program. "Everybody was welcome, as long as they drove clean diesels. ... And the Clean Truck Program has worked just as well there; 80 percent of the diesel pollution caused by trucks has been removed," said the Daily Breeze.
Tags
Share this page
Who's Blogging
- American Petroleum Institute
- American Trucking Associations
- Business Roundtable
- CTIA - The Wireless Association
- Grocery Manufacturers Association
- National Association of Chain Drug Stores
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association
- Nuclear Energy Institute
- Organization for International Investment
- Pat Cleary
- Personal Care Products Council
- Salt Institute
- USTelecom
Recent Posts
- Air Quality Improves At Port Of Long Beach, Study Says
01/05/2010 - Banning Owner-Operators is Wrong, Says Daily Breeze Newspaper
12/16/2009 - The Trouble with Tolling
12/11/2009 - Attacks on Port of Long Beach are a Fraud, says Long Beach Press-Telegram editorial
12/09/2009 - Long Beach City Rejects Appeal of Port Settlement
11/25/2009


Leave a comment