Blog Post from American Trucking Associations
WSJ: Cap-and-Trade Just a Ploy to Increase Federal Regulations
July 27, 2009
Written by: Brandon Borgna
Despite the narrow passage of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill last
month in the House, most of America's states and communities didn't even like
the legislation, said
The Wall Street Journal. Of the 50 state delegations, "28 voted no and
22 aye, and one quarter of the 219 majority votes came from New York and
California."
According to The Journal, nobody in Congress, not even Waxman or
Markey, make the case that this legislation will prevent any long-term
environmental catastrophe. The real winners of climate change legislation and
'green investments' will be labor unions, "for tucked away is the requirement
that any project receiving grants from the billions of giveaways in the
Waxman-Markey bill would be required to apply Davis-Bacon union wage rules,"
said The Journal.
The proposed climate change legislation will usher in federal regulation of
everything from personal wages to the use of items like lawnmowers and light
fixtures.
According to The Journal, "The Waxman-Markey bill would be without
question the biggest expansion of federal government control over our economy
since the 1930s."
"The real purpose of Waxman-Markey is to vastly expand the scope, power and
authority of the federal government," said The Journal. "Washington
would permanently regulate and dictate the performance of the U.S. economy,
reward constituencies it favors and punish those it doesn't, and make more and
more Americans dependant upon federal largesse."
Across the board, climate change legislation comes at a tremendous cost for
all Americans.
"The Heritage Foundation concludes it would reduce America's real gross
domestic product by $400 billion each year--a cumulative loss of $9.4 trillion
by 2035--leading to almost 2.5 million job losses, and raise inflation-adjusted
electricity rates by 90 percent," said The Journal. For a household of four, it
would cost on average $2,979 annually and in 2035 the total family cost would be
over $4,600 for everything, including power, food, supplies, gasoline and
transportation."
With no substantial environmental benefits, climate change legislation
promises nothing but increased energy costs and decreased global
competitiveness.
Tags
Share this page
Who's Blogging
- American Petroleum Institute
- American Trucking Associations
- Business Roundtable
- CTIA - The Wireless Association
- Grocery Manufacturers Association
- National Association of Chain Drug Stores
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association
- Nuclear Energy Institute
- Organization for International Investment
- Pat Cleary
- Personal Care Products Council
- Salt Institute
- USTelecom
Recent Posts
- 'Buying local' doesn't necessarily translate to 'eco-friendly'
11/20/2009 - As Truck Traffic Soars, Safety Improves
11/19/2009 - Truck Tonnage Will Grow Despite Recent Intermodal Attention
11/16/2009 - Where have all the rest areas gone?
11/13/2009 - Port of Los Angeles Reduces Emissions From Trucks Without Needless Concession Requirements
11/10/2009


Leave a comment