Why is this page text-only?

Today's Feature

Pressure Increases to Stop EPA GHG Regulations

Written by:

Two more letters were sent to Capitol Hill late this afternoon, asking Congress to stop the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from moving forward with greenhouse gas regulations.

A group of 98 organizations from across the country sent a letter to the U.S. Senate, asking for passage of the Murkowski-Lincoln resolution of disapproval that would prevent the EPA's proposed regulations.

The letter says efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) should be "decided by Congress, not by the EPA," and notes that there is "strong bipartisan support for Congress to intervene in this matter."

The groups that have signed the letter represent "millions of workers in every state of the nation, in every walk of life, across a broad spectrum of the economy from rural communities to the largest cities," including the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Congress of Racial Equality, the Forging Industry Association, the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council and many others.

In a separate letter to congressional leaders, 20 governors said they were "gravely concerned" over the proposed EPA regulations. The governors also stated the regulations "could be harmful to our economies at an especially critical time." They added:

"Economists estimate that states will face their worst fiscal situations within the next two years. As governors, we have the responsibility to protect jobs, promote economic growth, and mitigate any threats to financial stability in our states. We...strongly urge Congress to stop harmful EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions that could damage those vital interests."

The governors who signed the letter hail from Mississippi to Alaska, and from Hawaii to Virginia.

Just a moment ago, API released a statement about the two letters:

"The letters indicate broad-based, growing concern from both state governments and business and industry about the potentially severe adverse impacts of the proposed regulations. The EPA rules would discourage investments in domestic oil and natural gas projects, harm job creation, limit U.S. energy production, and increase import dependence, but their reach would go far beyond energy. 

 In every part of the nation, they could delay business expansion and new jobs, throw state economies into slow motion, inundate state agencies with added permitting work, and worsen state budget woes. The Clean Air Act was meant to control traditional air pollutants, not greenhouse gas emissions that come from every vehicle, home, factory and farm in America. A fit-for-purpose climate law is a much-preferred solution to addressing the climate challenge."

Recent Blog Posts

FDA should focus on real health priorities

Written by:

Years ago, when "GAO" stood for "General Accounting Office," that arm of Congress focused its reviews on how well government agencies were spending taxpayers' resources. A new GAO report suggests FDA should expend more resources on substances earlier determined to...

Broadband, Jobs and the Economy

Written by:

Today, lawmakers across the political spectrum agree that stimulating job growth and revitalizing our economy are key goals for our nation.  As policy-makers work to generate new economic opportunities, broadband continues to enrich the communities and livelihoods of American citizens.In...

Navistar Supports ATA's Driver Recruitment Initiative For Returning Military Personnel

Written by:

Navistar International Corp. presented a $10,000 check to ATA in support of its initiative to recruit returning military personnel into the trucking industry, TheTrucker.com reported last week."We're proud to support the ATA's driver recruitment effort," said Jim Hebe, Senior Vice...

Offshore Drilling: What's the Administration's Agenda?

Written by:

As the ranking Republican on the House Natural Resources Committee, Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA) is in a position to closely observe and act on the administration's proposed energy policies.  Today in an op-ed published in The Washington Times, he...

Second controlled trial of low-sodium diet confirms health risk

Written by:

It remains hard to believe, when the daily newspapers are screaming for action to curtail population sodium intakes, that until this month, only one controlled trial has ever examined the actual health outcomes of salt reduction. Sure, we've seen computer...

The Kid's Gotta Eat

Written by:

Recently Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack gave a speech before the National Press Club in which he laid out the need to improve nutrition in schools.  We couldn't agree more! As we've pointed out on here numerous times over the...

Virginia Is Ready for Offshore Drilling

Written by:

The Commonwealth of Virginia has signaled that it's ready for offshore energy development. This week the state Senate passed a proposal that provides a roadmap for the allocation of offshore energy royalties and revenues, devoting 70 percent to transportation, 20...

Salt industry productivity setting the pace

Written by:

With federal spending skyrocketing out of control with its pent-up inflationary impact and national economic indicators garnering above-the-fold front page coverage almost daily, Americans' economic anxieties are on the rise and the nation's economic health in grave jeopardy. Only reawakening...

Food salt slugfest

Written by:

Today's NY Times (free subscription) carries an opinion column by science editor John Tierney, "Salt Wars." It recounts the exchanges between medical experts over the advisability of asking the general population to reduce dietary salt and hits both of the...

More Posts >